Head-to-Head Analysis

Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds vs Organic all vegetable shortening

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds

Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic all vegetable shortening

Organic all vegetable shortening

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
917 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
53.6g
Fat
100g
21.4g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds and Organic all vegetable shortening side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds is the clear winner. With 310 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Organic all vegetable shortening (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic all vegetable shortening is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic all vegetable shortening in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds or Organic all vegetable shortening?

It depends on your goals. Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds has 607 calories, while Organic all vegetable shortening has 917 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds vegan?

No, Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chile 'N Lime Flavored Almonds and Organic all vegetable shortening?

There is a difference of 310 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.