Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars vs Cinnamon Bun Softcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars

Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Cinnamon Bun Softcorn

Cinnamon Bun Softcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
288 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
20.5g
Sugars
14.3g
19.2g
Fat
0g
2.7g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars and Cinnamon Bun Softcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars is the clear winner. With 69 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars contains significantly more sugar (20.5g) compared to the milder Cinnamon Bun Softcorn (14.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Cinnamon Bun Softcorn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars offers a protein boost with 2.74g per 100g, outperforming Cinnamon Bun Softcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars or Cinnamon Bun Softcorn?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars has 288 calories, while Cinnamon Bun Softcorn has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars vegan?

No, Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Almond Oatmilk Dessert Bars and Cinnamon Bun Softcorn?

There is a difference of 69 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.