Head-to-Head Analysis

CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS vs Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS

CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems

Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533.3 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
46.7g
Sugars
30g
33.3g
Fat
43.3g
10g
Protein
6.7g
0.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS and Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS is the clear winner. With 67 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS contains significantly more sugar (46.666666666667g) compared to the milder Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems (30g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS or Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems?

It depends on your goals. CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS has 533.33333333333 calories, while Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS vegan?

No, CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between CHOCOLATE CPVERED ALMONDS and Mint Dark Chocolate Snacking Gems?

There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.