Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras vs Swedish Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras

Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Swedish Fish

Swedish Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
590 kcal
Energy
366.7 kcal
22g
Sugars
76.7g
47g
Fat
0g
11g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras and Swedish Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras is the more energy-dense option here, packing 223 more calories per 100g than Swedish Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras takes the lead with only 22g of sugar per 100g, whereas Swedish Fish contains 76.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Swedish Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras or Swedish Fish?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras has 590 calories, while Swedish Fish has 366.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras vegan?

No, Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate negro 72% cacao con almendras enteras and Swedish Fish?

There is a difference of 223 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.