Head-to-Head Analysis

chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling vs Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling

chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks

Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
452 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
35.5g
Sugars
71.4g
22.6g
Fat
0g
3.2g
Protein
2.4g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling and Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling takes the lead with only 35.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks contains 71.428571428571g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling or Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks?

It depends on your goals. chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling has 452 calories, while Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling vegan?

No, chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between chocolatey cookies with HERSHEY'S fudge filling and Peeps Pink Marshmallow Chicks?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.