Head-to-Head Analysis

Chuck Ground Beef vs Big Foot

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chuck Ground Beef

Chuck Ground Beef

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Big Foot

Big Foot

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
520 kcal
0g
Sugars
4g
19.6g
Fat
28g
17g
Protein
4g
0.2g
Salt
2.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chuck Ground Beef and Big Foot side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chuck Ground Beef is the clear winner. With 270 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chuck Ground Beef takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Big Foot contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chuck Ground Beef offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Big Foot in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chuck Ground Beef or Big Foot?

Chuck Ground Beef appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chuck Ground Beef vegan?

No, Chuck Ground Beef is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chuck Ground Beef and Big Foot?

There is a difference of 270 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.