Head-to-Head Analysis

Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar vs Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar

Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
545 kcal
Energy
567.6 kcal
45.5g
Sugars
32.4g
40.9g
Fat
35.1g
0g
Protein
8.1g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar and Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar is the clear winner. With 23 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar contains significantly more sugar (45.45g) compared to the milder Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa (32.432432432432g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar or Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa?

It depends on your goals. Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar has 545 calories, while Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa has 567.56756756757 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar vegan?

No, Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cinnamon Butter with Brown Sugar and Organic Classic Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.