Clams vs Solid pack light tuna in olive oil
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Clams
Solid pack light tuna in olive oil
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Clams and Solid pack light tuna in olive oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Clams is the clear winner. With 109 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Clams contains significantly more sugar (1.5384615384615g) compared to the milder Solid pack light tuna in olive oil (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Solid pack light tuna in olive oil is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Clams or Solid pack light tuna in olive oil?
It depends on your goals. Clams has 76.923076923077 calories, while Solid pack light tuna in olive oil has 186 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Clams vegan?
No, Clams is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Clams and Solid pack light tuna in olive oil?
There is a difference of 109 calories per 100g between the two products.
