Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic vs Chickpea & corn rotini pasta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Classic

Classic

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chickpea & corn rotini pasta

Chickpea & corn rotini pasta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
363.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
10g
Fat
4.5g
2g
Protein
18.2g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic and Chickpea & corn rotini pasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Classic is the clear winner. With 204 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Classic takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chickpea & corn rotini pasta contains 3.6363636363636g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic or Chickpea & corn rotini pasta?

Classic appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Classic vegan?

No, Classic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic and Chickpea & corn rotini pasta?

There is a difference of 204 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.