Head-to-Head Analysis

Classic Corn Dogs vs Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Classic Corn Dogs

Classic Corn Dogs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce

Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
289 kcal
Energy
94.1 kcal
9.2g
Sugars
14.6g
17.1g
Fat
0g
6.6g
Protein
0.6g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Classic Corn Dogs and Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Classic Corn Dogs is the more energy-dense option here, packing 195 more calories per 100g than Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Classic Corn Dogs takes the lead with only 9.21g of sugar per 100g, whereas Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce contains 14.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Classic Corn Dogs offers a protein boost with 6.58g per 100g, outperforming Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Classic Corn Dogs or Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Classic Corn Dogs has 289 calories, while Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Classic Corn Dogs vegan?

No, Classic Corn Dogs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Classic Corn Dogs and Yams Cut Sweet Potatoes In Orange Pineapple Sauce?

There is a difference of 195 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.