Classic Malt vs Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Classic Malt
Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Classic Malt and Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Classic Malt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 348 more calories per 100g than Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Classic Malt contains significantly more sugar (46g) compared to the milder Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart (2.9166666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Classic Malt offers a protein boost with 11g per 100g, outperforming Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Classic Malt or Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart?
It depends on your goals. Classic Malt has 377 calories, while Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart has 29.166666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Classic Malt vegan?
No, Classic Malt is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Classic Malt and Coconut Milk Beverage Original Shelf Stable Quart?
There is a difference of 348 calories per 100g between the two products.
