Head-to-Head Analysis

Coco Caramel Almond vs Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coco Caramel Almond

Coco Caramel Almond

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes

Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
14.5g
Fat
0g
36.4g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coco Caramel Almond and Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Coco Caramel Almond is the more energy-dense option here, packing 382 more calories per 100g than Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coco Caramel Almond contains significantly more sugar (3.64g) compared to the milder Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Coco Caramel Almond offers a protein boost with 36.4g per 100g, outperforming Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coco Caramel Almond or Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes?

It depends on your goals. Coco Caramel Almond has 382 calories, while Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coco Caramel Almond vegan?

No, Coco Caramel Almond is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coco Caramel Almond and Mary Ruth's Ultra Digestive Food Enzymes?

There is a difference of 382 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.