Coconut cashew crisps vs Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Coconut cashew crisps
Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Coconut cashew crisps and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Coconut cashew crisps is the more energy-dense option here, packing 517 more calories per 100g than Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Coconut cashew crisps contains significantly more sugar (34.4828g) compared to the milder Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Coconut cashew crisps offers a protein boost with 6.8966g per 100g, outperforming Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Coconut cashew crisps or Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?
It depends on your goals. Coconut cashew crisps has 517.2414 calories, while Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Coconut cashew crisps vegan?
No, Coconut cashew crisps is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Coconut cashew crisps and Milk Chocolate Covered Macadamias?
There is a difference of 517 calories per 100g between the two products.
