Head-to-Head Analysis

Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel vs Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel

Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips

Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
414.6 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
46.3g
Sugars
3.6g
17.1g
Fat
32.1g
2.4g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel and Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel is the clear winner. With 121 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel contains significantly more sugar (46.341463414634g) compared to the milder Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips (3.5714g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel or Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel has 414.63414634146 calories, while Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips has 535.7143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel vegan?

No, Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coffee Cakes Cinnamon Streusel and Kettle cooked jalapeno flavored potato chips?

There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.