Head-to-Head Analysis

Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer vs Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer

Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt

Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
118 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
0g
6.7g
Fat
3.5g
0g
Protein
10.6g
0.1g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer and Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer is the more energy-dense option here, packing 82 more calories per 100g than Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer or Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt?

It depends on your goals. Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer has 200 calories, while Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt has 118 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer vegan?

No, Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Coffee Mate Pumpkin Spice Creamer and Shelled Soybeans Edamame with Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.