Head-to-Head Analysis

Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon vs Kosher Dill Pickle Spears

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon

Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kosher Dill Pickle Spears

Kosher Dill Pickle Spears

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
123 kcal
Energy
51 kcal
0g
Sugars
63.8g
3.5g
Fat
0g
22.8g
Protein
0g
3.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon and Kosher Dill Pickle Spears side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Kosher Dill Pickle Spears. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kosher Dill Pickle Spears contains 63.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon offers a protein boost with 22.8g per 100g, outperforming Kosher Dill Pickle Spears in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon or Kosher Dill Pickle Spears?

It depends on your goals. Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon has 123 calories, while Kosher Dill Pickle Spears has 51 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon vegan?

No, Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cold Smoked Alaskan Wild Sockeye Salmon and Kosher Dill Pickle Spears?

There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.