Head-to-Head Analysis

Confetti Cookies vs Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Confetti Cookies

Confetti Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored

Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
351 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
43.2g
21.4g
Fat
2.7g
0g
Protein
2.7g
1.1g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Confetti Cookies and Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Confetti Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 78 more calories per 100g than Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Confetti Cookies takes the lead with only 28.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored contains 43.24g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Confetti Cookies or Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored?

It depends on your goals. Confetti Cookies has 429 calories, while Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored has 351 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Confetti Cookies vegan?

No, Confetti Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Confetti Cookies and Soft Australian Licorice Mango Flavored?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.