Cooked Ham vs Uncured Beef Franks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cooked Ham
Uncured Beef Franks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cooked Ham and Uncured Beef Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Cooked Ham is the clear winner. With 233 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Cooked Ham contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Uncured Beef Franks (1.89g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Uncured Beef Franks is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Cooked Ham offers a protein boost with 17.86g per 100g, outperforming Uncured Beef Franks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cooked Ham or Uncured Beef Franks?
It depends on your goals. Cooked Ham has 107 calories, while Uncured Beef Franks has 339.62 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Cooked Ham vegan?
No, Cooked Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cooked Ham and Uncured Beef Franks?
There is a difference of 233 calories per 100g between the two products.
