Cookies vs Ritz Crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cookies
Ritz Crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cookies and Ritz Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Cookies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 35 more calories per 100g than Ritz Crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Cookies contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Ritz Crackers (6.25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ritz Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Cookies offers a protein boost with 8.9g per 100g, outperforming Ritz Crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cookies or Ritz Crackers?
It depends on your goals. Cookies has 535 calories, while Ritz Crackers has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Cookies vegan?
No, Cookies is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cookies and Ritz Crackers?
There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.
