Head-to-Head Analysis

Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip vs Watermelon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Watermelon

Watermelon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
42.9g
Sugars
0g
21.4g
Fat
0g
3.6g
Protein
0g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip and Watermelon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip is the more energy-dense option here, packing 500 more calories per 100g than Watermelon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip contains significantly more sugar (42.9g) compared to the milder Watermelon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Watermelon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip offers a protein boost with 3.57g per 100g, outperforming Watermelon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip or Watermelon?

It depends on your goals. Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip has 500 calories, while Watermelon has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip vegan?

No, Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip and Watermelon?

There is a difference of 500 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.