Head-to-Head Analysis

Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels vs Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels

Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
0g
Sugars
36.7g
16.1g
Fat
30g
7.1g
Protein
6.7g
2.2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels and Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels is the clear winner. With 69 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips contains 36.669996666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels or Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips?

Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels vegan?

No, Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Corn nuts chile picante con limon crunchy corn kernels and Baked crunchy chocolate coconut chips?

There is a difference of 69 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.