Cosmic Cocoa vs Ritz Crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Cosmic Cocoa
Ritz Crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Cosmic Cocoa and Ritz Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Cosmic Cocoa is the clear winner. With 257 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Cosmic Cocoa contains significantly more sugar (14.9g) compared to the milder Ritz Crackers (6.25g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ritz Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Cosmic Cocoa offers a protein boost with 11.2g per 100g, outperforming Ritz Crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Cosmic Cocoa or Ritz Crackers?
It depends on your goals. Cosmic Cocoa has 243 calories, while Ritz Crackers has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Cosmic Cocoa vegan?
No, Cosmic Cocoa is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Cosmic Cocoa and Ritz Crackers?
There is a difference of 257 calories per 100g between the two products.
