Head-to-Head Analysis

Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese vs Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese

Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
393 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
0g
Sugars
43.3g
32.1g
Fat
16.7g
21.4g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese and Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese is the clear winner. With 40 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites contains 43.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese or Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites?

Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese vegan?

No, Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cotswold Double Gloucester Cheese and Larabar Cherry Chocolate Chip Fruit & Nut Bites?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.