Head-to-Head Analysis

Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap vs Chocolate and Vanilla

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap

Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chocolate and Vanilla

Chocolate and Vanilla

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
191 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
5g
Sugars
0g
7.8g
Fat
0g
10.4g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap and Chocolate and Vanilla side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap is the more energy-dense option here, packing 191 more calories per 100g than Chocolate and Vanilla. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap contains significantly more sugar (4.96g) compared to the milder Chocolate and Vanilla (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chocolate and Vanilla is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap offers a protein boost with 10.4g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate and Vanilla in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap or Chocolate and Vanilla?

It depends on your goals. Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap has 191 calories, while Chocolate and Vanilla has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap vegan?

No, Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cranberry Apple Tuna Wrap and Chocolate and Vanilla?

There is a difference of 191 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.