Head-to-Head Analysis

Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal vs Shredded wheat cereal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal

Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Shredded wheat cereal

Shredded wheat cereal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
397.3 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
38.4g
Sugars
0.8g
9.6g
Fat
2.5g
6.9g
Protein
10g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal and Shredded wheat cereal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal is the more energy-dense option here, packing 47 more calories per 100g than Shredded wheat cereal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal contains significantly more sugar (38.36g) compared to the milder Shredded wheat cereal (0.83333333333333g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Shredded wheat cereal is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal or Shredded wheat cereal?

It depends on your goals. Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal has 397.26 calories, while Shredded wheat cereal has 350 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal vegan?

No, Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cranberry walnut apple steel-cut rolled oatmeal and Shredded wheat cereal?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.