Head-to-Head Analysis

Creamer+ vs Mala latiao

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Creamer+

Creamer+

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mala latiao

Mala latiao

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
60 kcal
Energy
1913 kcal
4g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
30.5g
4g
Protein
6.9g
0.2g
Salt
5.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Creamer+ and Mala latiao side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Creamer+ is the clear winner. With 1853 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Creamer+ contains significantly more sugar (4g) compared to the milder Mala latiao (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mala latiao is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Creamer+ or Mala latiao?

It depends on your goals. Creamer+ has 60 calories, while Mala latiao has 1913 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Creamer+ vegan?

No, Creamer+ is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Creamer+ and Mala latiao?

There is a difference of 1853 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.