Head-to-Head Analysis

Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing vs Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing

Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker

Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
4380 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
0g
23.3g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
156g
2.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing and Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing is the clear winner. With 4113 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing or Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker?

It depends on your goals. Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing has 267 calories, while Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker has 4380 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing vegan?

No, Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Creamy Ranch Reduced Fat Dressing and Scandinavian Crispbread With Oat Bran Cracker?

There is a difference of 4113 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.