Head-to-Head Analysis

Crescent Rolls vs Jack Link's Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Crescent Rolls

Crescent Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Jack Link's Original

Jack Link's Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357.1 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
21.4g
17.9g
Fat
5.4g
7.1g
Protein
35.7g
1.9g
Salt
4.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crescent Rolls and Jack Link's Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crescent Rolls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 71 more calories per 100g than Jack Link's Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Crescent Rolls takes the lead with only 7.1428571428571g of sugar per 100g, whereas Jack Link's Original contains 21.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crescent Rolls or Jack Link's Original?

It depends on your goals. Crescent Rolls has 357.14285714286 calories, while Jack Link's Original has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crescent Rolls vegan?

No, Crescent Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crescent Rolls and Jack Link's Original?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.