Head-to-Head Analysis

Crispy chik’n patties vs Goma de mascar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Crispy chik’n patties

Crispy chik’n patties

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Goma de mascar

Goma de mascar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
6g
7.1g
Fat
0g
11.8g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crispy chik’n patties and Goma de mascar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crispy chik’n patties is the more energy-dense option here, packing 175 more calories per 100g than Goma de mascar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Crispy chik’n patties takes the lead with only 1.1764705882353g of sugar per 100g, whereas Goma de mascar contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Crispy chik’n patties offers a protein boost with 11.764705882353g per 100g, outperforming Goma de mascar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crispy chik’n patties or Goma de mascar?

It depends on your goals. Crispy chik’n patties has 200 calories, while Goma de mascar has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crispy chik’n patties vegan?

No, Crispy chik’n patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crispy chik’n patties and Goma de mascar?

There is a difference of 175 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.