Head-to-Head Analysis

Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread vs Kickin Crab Rangoon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread

Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kickin Crab Rangoon

Kickin Crab Rangoon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
656 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
15.6g
Sugars
0g
53.1g
Fat
0g
15.6g
Protein
10g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread and Kickin Crab Rangoon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread is the more energy-dense option here, packing 289 more calories per 100g than Kickin Crab Rangoon. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread contains significantly more sugar (15.6g) compared to the milder Kickin Crab Rangoon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kickin Crab Rangoon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread offers a protein boost with 15.6g per 100g, outperforming Kickin Crab Rangoon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread or Kickin Crab Rangoon?

It depends on your goals. Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread has 656 calories, while Kickin Crab Rangoon has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread vegan?

No, Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crunchy Classic Peanut Butter Spread and Kickin Crab Rangoon?

There is a difference of 289 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.