Head-to-Head Analysis

Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing vs The Original Cracker Jack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing

Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Package of The Original Cracker Jack

The Original Cracker Jack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
151 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
17g
30g
Fat
3g
0g
Protein
2g
2.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing and The Original Cracker Jack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 149 more calories per 100g than The Original Cracker Jack. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing takes the lead with only 6.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas The Original Cracker Jack contains 17g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing or The Original Cracker Jack?

It depends on your goals. Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing has 300 calories, while The Original Cracker Jack has 151 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing vegan?

No, Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cucmber Tzatziki Style Dressing and The Original Cracker Jack?

There is a difference of 149 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.