Head-to-Head Analysis

CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP vs Apple sauce Pouch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP

CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Apple sauce Pouch

Apple sauce Pouch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
451 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
11.1g
16.9g
Fat
0g
9.9g
Protein
0g
6.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP and Apple sauce Pouch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP is the more energy-dense option here, packing 384 more calories per 100g than Apple sauce Pouch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP takes the lead with only 2.82g of sugar per 100g, whereas Apple sauce Pouch contains 11.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP offers a protein boost with 9.86g per 100g, outperforming Apple sauce Pouch in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP or Apple sauce Pouch?

It depends on your goals. CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP has 451 calories, while Apple sauce Pouch has 66.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP vegan?

No, CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between CUP NOODLES CHICKEN FLAVOR RAMEN NOODLE SOUP and Apple sauce Pouch?

There is a difference of 384 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.