Head-to-Head Analysis

Daisy vs Simple Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Daisy

Daisy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Simple Dark Chocolate

Simple Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
16.7g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Daisy and Simple Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Daisy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Simple Dark Chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Daisy contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Simple Dark Chocolate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Simple Dark Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Daisy offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Simple Dark Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Daisy or Simple Dark Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Daisy has 200 calories, while Simple Dark Chocolate has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Daisy vegan?

No, Daisy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Daisy and Simple Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.