Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds vs Fudge cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Dark Chocolate covered Almonds

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Fudge cookies

Fudge cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
486 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
34.3g
36.7g
Fat
20g
10g
Protein
2.9g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate covered Almonds and Fudge cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 14 more calories per 100g than Fudge cookies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate covered Almonds offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Fudge cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered Almonds or Fudge cookies?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 500 calories, while Fudge cookies has 486 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate covered Almonds vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate covered Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate covered Almonds and Fudge cookies?

There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.