Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt vs Crisps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt

Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Crisps

Crisps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
486 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
37.1g
Sugars
0g
25.7g
Fat
0g
5.7g
Protein
0g
1.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt and Crisps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 486 more calories per 100g than Crisps. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (37.1g) compared to the milder Crisps (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Crisps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 5.71g per 100g, outperforming Crisps in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt or Crisps?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt has 486 calories, while Crisps has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate covered Honey Grahams with Sea Salt and Crisps?

There is a difference of 486 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.