Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s vs Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s
Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s and Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s is the more energy-dense option here, packing 97 more calories per 100g than Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s contains significantly more sugar (39.473684210526g) compared to the milder Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips (17.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s or Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?
It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s has 526.31578947368 calories, while Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s vegan?
No, Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate covered macadamia’s and Sweets & Beets No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?
There is a difference of 97 calories per 100g between the two products.
