Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows vs Pitted Prunes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows

Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted Prunes

Pitted Prunes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
385 kcal
Energy
225 kcal
61.5g
Sugars
32.5g
9.6g
Fat
0g
3.9g
Protein
2.5g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows and Pitted Prunes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows is the more energy-dense option here, packing 160 more calories per 100g than Pitted Prunes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows contains significantly more sugar (61.5g) compared to the milder Pitted Prunes (32.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted Prunes is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows or Pitted Prunes?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows has 385 calories, while Pitted Prunes has 225 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Marshmallows and Pitted Prunes?

There is a difference of 160 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.