Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces vs Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces
Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces is the clear winner. With 70 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces takes the lead with only 31.6g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy contains 46.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces offers a protein boost with 2.63g per 100g, outperforming Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces or Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?
Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces vegan?
No, Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dark chocolate covered strawberry pieces and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?
There is a difference of 70 calories per 100g between the two products.
