Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Hearts vs Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Hearts

Dark Chocolate Hearts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree

Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
180 kcal
Energy
61.9 kcal
14g
Sugars
10.6g
12g
Fat
0g
2g
Protein
0.9g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Hearts and Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Hearts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 118 more calories per 100g than Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Hearts contains significantly more sugar (14g) compared to the milder Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree (10.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Hearts or Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Hearts has 180 calories, while Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree has 61.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Hearts vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Hearts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Hearts and Organic Peter Rabbit Strawberry & Banana Fruit Puree?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.