Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews vs smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews

Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

smooth Mint in Dark chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
30g
Sugars
0g
36.7g
Fat
28.6g
10g
Protein
3.6g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews is the more energy-dense option here, packing 140 more calories per 100g than smooth Mint in Dark chocolate. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews contains significantly more sugar (30g) compared to the milder smooth Mint in Dark chocolate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, smooth Mint in Dark chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming smooth Mint in Dark chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews or smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews has 533 calories, while smooth Mint in Dark chocolate has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Salted Cashews and smooth Mint in Dark chocolate?

There is a difference of 140 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.