Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs vs Toasted chips, original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs

Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Toasted chips, original

Toasted chips, original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
516.1 kcal
Energy
448 kcal
41.9g
Sugars
3.5g
32.3g
Fat
15.5g
6.5g
Protein
6.9g
0.2g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs and Toasted chips, original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs is the more energy-dense option here, packing 68 more calories per 100g than Toasted chips, original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs contains significantly more sugar (41.935483870968g) compared to the milder Toasted chips, original (3.45g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Toasted chips, original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs or Toasted chips, original?

It depends on your goals. Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs has 516.12903225806 calories, while Toasted chips, original has 448 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs vegan?

No, Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark chocolate thins with crispy rice puffs and Toasted chips, original?

There is a difference of 68 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.