Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds vs Sea Salt Pretzel Twists

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds

Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt Pretzel Twists

Sea Salt Pretzel Twists

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
548 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
38.7g
Sugars
3.6g
38.7g
Fat
10.7g
9.7g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
3.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds and Sea Salt Pretzel Twists side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt Pretzel Twists. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds contains significantly more sugar (38.7g) compared to the milder Sea Salt Pretzel Twists (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt Pretzel Twists is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds offers a protein boost with 9.68g per 100g, outperforming Sea Salt Pretzel Twists in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds or Sea Salt Pretzel Twists?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds has 548 calories, while Sea Salt Pretzel Twists has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate with Whole Almonds and Sea Salt Pretzel Twists?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.