Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Concentrated Tomato Paste vs Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Double Concentrated Tomato Paste

Double Concentrated Tomato Paste

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
166.7 kcal
Energy
607 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
21.4g
0g
Fat
42.9g
6.7g
Protein
3.6g
0.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Concentrated Tomato Paste and Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Double Concentrated Tomato Paste is the clear winner. With 440 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Double Concentrated Tomato Paste takes the lead with only 13.333333333333g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips contains 21.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Double Concentrated Tomato Paste offers a protein boost with 6.6666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Concentrated Tomato Paste or Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?

Double Concentrated Tomato Paste appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Double Concentrated Tomato Paste vegan?

No, Double Concentrated Tomato Paste is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Concentrated Tomato Paste and Sweet Potato No Salt Added Vegetable Chips?

There is a difference of 440 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.