Head-to-Head Analysis

Durham’s vs Ritz crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Durham’s

Durham’s

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ritz crackers

Ritz crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
0g
40g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Durham’s and Ritz crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Durham’s is the more energy-dense option here, packing 567 more calories per 100g than Ritz crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Durham’s contains significantly more sugar (16.7g) compared to the milder Ritz crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ritz crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Durham’s offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Ritz crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Durham’s or Ritz crackers?

It depends on your goals. Durham’s has 567 calories, while Ritz crackers has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Durham’s vegan?

No, Durham’s is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Durham’s and Ritz crackers?

There is a difference of 567 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.