Earl Grey Grapefruit vs chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Earl Grey Grapefruit
chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Earl Grey Grapefruit and chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Earl Grey Grapefruit is the more energy-dense option here, packing 21 more calories per 100g than chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Earl Grey Grapefruit takes the lead with only 34.2210358g of sugar per 100g, whereas chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels contains 46.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Earl Grey Grapefruit or chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels?
It depends on your goals. Earl Grey Grapefruit has 421.18198 calories, while chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Earl Grey Grapefruit vegan?
No, Earl Grey Grapefruit is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Earl Grey Grapefruit and chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels?
There is a difference of 21 calories per 100g between the two products.
