Head-to-Head Analysis

Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken vs Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken

Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks

Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
247 kcal
Energy
348 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
39.1g
9.7g
Fat
0g
11.5g
Protein
0g
1.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken and Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken is the clear winner. With 101 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken takes the lead with only 1.76g of sugar per 100g, whereas Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks contains 39.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken offers a protein boost with 11.5g per 100g, outperforming Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken or Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks?

Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken vegan?

No, Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Eatz Buffalo Style Chicken and Assorted Fruit Fruit Flavored Snacks?

There is a difference of 101 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.