Head-to-Head Analysis

Elderberry Ginger vs almond MALK unsweetened

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Elderberry Ginger

Elderberry Ginger

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of almond MALK unsweetened

almond MALK unsweetened

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
12.7 kcal
Energy
29.2 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
2.5g
0g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Elderberry Ginger and almond MALK unsweetened side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Elderberry Ginger is the clear winner. With 16 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Elderberry Ginger contains significantly more sugar (1.13g) compared to the milder almond MALK unsweetened (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, almond MALK unsweetened is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Elderberry Ginger or almond MALK unsweetened?

It depends on your goals. Elderberry Ginger has 12.7 calories, while almond MALK unsweetened has 29.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Elderberry Ginger vegan?

No, Elderberry Ginger is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Elderberry Ginger and almond MALK unsweetened?

There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.