Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt vs Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt

Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt and Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 233 more calories per 100g than Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt contains significantly more sugar (119g) compared to the milder Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt or Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal?
It depends on your goals. Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt has 600 calories, while Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt vegan?
No, Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Excellence Dark Chocolate With Sea Salt and Old Fashioned Stone Ground Yellow Corn Meal?
There is a difference of 233 calories per 100g between the two products.




