Head-to-Head Analysis

Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity vs Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity

Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips

Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
800 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
93.3g
Fat
21.4g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity and Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity is the more energy-dense option here, packing 336 more calories per 100g than Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips contains 3.5714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity or Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity has 800 calories, while Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity vegan?

No, Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Extra Virgin Olive Oil Smooth And Fruity and Pico de Gallo White CornTortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 336 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.