Head-to-Head Analysis

Fabulous fondant cake icing vs Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Fabulous fondant cake icing

Fabulous fondant cake icing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips

Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
667 kcal
88.6g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
53.3g
0g
Protein
13.3g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Fabulous fondant cake icing and Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Fabulous fondant cake icing is the clear winner. With 267 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Fabulous fondant cake icing contains significantly more sugar (88.57g) compared to the milder Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Fabulous fondant cake icing or Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips?

It depends on your goals. Fabulous fondant cake icing has 400 calories, while Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips has 667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Fabulous fondant cake icing vegan?

No, Fabulous fondant cake icing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Fabulous fondant cake icing and Organic Unsweetened 100% Dark Chocolate Baking Chips?

There is a difference of 267 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.